David,
This is due to a software glitch. SNES_DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN was added
long after the origins of SNES and, in places, the code was never fully updated
to handle function domain problems. In particular, parts of the line search
don't handle it correctly. Can you run with -snes_view and that will help us
find the spot that needs to be updated.
Barry
> On Dec 21, 2025, at 5:53 PM, David Knezevic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi, actually, I have a follow up on this topic.
>
> I noticed that when I call SNESSetFunctionDomainError(), it exits the solve
> as expected, but it leads to a converged reason "DIVERGED_LINE_SEARCH"
> instead of "DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN". If I also set
> SNESSetConvergedReason(snes, SNES_DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN) in the callback,
> then I get the expected SNES_DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN converged reason, so
> that's what I'm doing now. I was surprised by this behavior, though, since I
> expected that calling SNESSetFunctionDomainError woudld lead to the
> DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN converged reason, so I just wanted to check on what
> could be causing this.
>
> FYI, I'm using PETSc 3.23.4
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 8:10 AM David Knezevic <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Thank you very much for this guidance. I switched to use
>> SNES_DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN, and I don't get any errors now.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 3:43 PM Barry Smith <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 17, 2025, at 2:47 PM, David Knezevic <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Stefano and Barry: Thank you, this is very helpful.
>>>>
>>>> I'll give some more info here which may help to clarify further. Normally
>>>> we do just get a negative "converged reason", as you described. But in
>>>> this specific case where I'm having issues the solve is a numerically
>>>> sensitive creep solve, which has exponential terms in the residual and
>>>> jacobian callback that can "blow up" and give NaN values. In this case,
>>>> the root cause is that we hit a NaN value during a callback, and then we
>>>> throw an exception (in libMesh C++ code) which I gather leads to the SNES
>>>> solve exiting with this error code.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to tell the SNES to terminate with a negative "converged
>>>> reason" because we've encountered some issue during the callback?
>>>
>>> In your callback you should call SNESSetFunctionDomainError() and make
>>> sure the function value has an infinity or NaN in it (you can call
>>> VecFlag() for this purpose)).
>>>
>>> Now SNESConvergedReason will be a completely reasonable
>>> SNES_DIVERGED_FUNCTION_DOMAIN
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>> If you are using an ancient version of PETSc (I hope you are using the
>>> latest since that always has more bug fixes and features) that does not
>>> have SNESSetFunctionDomainError then just make sure the function vector
>>> result has an infinity or NaN in it and then SNESConvergedReason will be
>>> SNES_DIVERGED_FNORM_NAN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 2:25 PM Barry Smith <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2025, at 2:08 PM, David Knezevic via petsc-users
>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm using PETSc via the libMesh framework, so creating a MWE is
>>>>>> complicated by that, unfortunately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The situation is that I am not modifying the solution vector in a
>>>>>> callback. The SNES solve has terminated, with PetscErrorCode 82, and I
>>>>>> then want to update the solution vector (reset it to the "previously
>>>>>> converged value") and then try to solve again with a smaller load
>>>>>> increment. This is a typical "auto load stepping" strategy in FE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once a PetscError is generated you CANNOT continue the PETSc program,
>>>>> it is not designed to allow this and trying to continue will lead to
>>>>> further problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what you need to do is prevent PETSc from getting to the point
>>>>> where an actual PetscErrorCode of 82 is generated. Normally SNESSolve()
>>>>> returns without generating an error even if the nonlinear solver failed
>>>>> (for example did not converge). One then uses SNESGetConvergedReason to
>>>>> check if it converged or not. Normally when SNESSolve() returns,
>>>>> regardless of whether the converged reason is negative or positive, there
>>>>> will be no locked vectors and one can modify the SNES object and call
>>>>> SNESSolve again.
>>>>>
>>>>> So my guess is that an actual PETSc error is being generated because
>>>>> SNESSetErrorIfNotConverged(snes,PETSC_TRUE) is being called by either
>>>>> your code or libMesh or the option -snes_error_if_not_converged is being
>>>>> used. In your case when you wish the code to work after a non-converged
>>>>> SNESSolve() these options should never be set instead you should check
>>>>> the result of SNESGetConvergedReason() to check if SNESSolve has failed.
>>>>> If SNESSetErrorIfNotConverged() is never being set that may indicate you
>>>>> are using an old version of PETSc or have it a bug inside PETSc's SNES
>>>>> that does not handle errors correctly and we can help fix the problem if
>>>>> you can provide a full debug output version of when the error occurs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Barry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the key piece of info I'd like to know is, at what point is the
>>>>>> solution vector "unlocked" by the SNES object? Should it be unlocked as
>>>>>> soon as the SNES solve has terminated with PetscErrorCode 82? Since it
>>>>>> seems to me that it hasn't been unlocked yet (maybe just on a subset of
>>>>>> the processes). Should I manually "unlock" the solution vector by
>>>>>> calling VecLockWriteSet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 2:02 PM Stefano Zampini
>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> You are not allowed to call VecGetArray on the solution vector of an
>>>>>>> SNES object within a user callback, nor to modify its values in any
>>>>>>> other way.
>>>>>>> Put in C++ lingo, the solution vector is a "const" argument
>>>>>>> It would be great if you could provide an MWE to help us understand
>>>>>>> your problem
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il giorno mer 17 dic 2025 alle ore 20:51 David Knezevic via petsc-users
>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a question about this error:
>>>>>>>>> Vector 'Vec_0x84000005_0' (argument #2) was locked for read-only
>>>>>>>>> access in unknown_function() at unknown file:0 (line numbers only
>>>>>>>>> accurate to function begin)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm encountering this error in an FE solve where there is an error
>>>>>>>> encountered during the residual/jacobian assembly, and what we
>>>>>>>> normally do in that situation is shrink the load step and continue,
>>>>>>>> starting from the "last converged solution". However, in this case I'm
>>>>>>>> running on 32 processes, and 5 of the processes report the error above
>>>>>>>> about a "locked vector".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We clear the SNES object (via SNESDestroy) before we reset the
>>>>>>>> solution to the "last converged solution", and then we make a new SNES
>>>>>>>> object subsequently. But it seems to me that somehow the solution
>>>>>>>> vector is still marked as "locked" on 5 of the processes when we
>>>>>>>> modify the solution vector, which leads to the error above.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was wondering if someone could advise on what the best way to handle
>>>>>>>> this would be? I thought one option could be to add an MPI barrier
>>>>>>>> call prior to updating the solution vector to "last converged
>>>>>>>> solution", to make sure that the SNES object is destroyed on all procs
>>>>>>>> (and hence the locks cleared) before editing the solution vector, but
>>>>>>>> I'm unsure if that would make a difference. Any help would be most
>>>>>>>> appreciated!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>
>>>
