On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:20 PM, S. Donaldson <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems that tag references are not dynamically defined [ unless > perhaps they are used in authpf scenarios? ]. Would it make sense for the > parser to issue a warning if a 'tagged value' references appear but no > defining 'tag value' is found in a ruleset?
A warning would make sense. Definitely not an error though, since the 'tag value' rule might be added later in an anchor. I wonder how many people have gotten the bright idea of adding 'tagged xyz' to comment out a rule without disturbing the rule numbering... -ken
