On 29/07/2002, Ed White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Actually active FTP can be used via NAT rules, without ftp-proxy. > > Please tell me how.
pass out proto tcp from $lan to any keep state or whatever. try to understand how active/passive ftp works > > Yes, while IIRC rev-proxy-support is only in -current. Daniel? > > FTP > IRC ? IIRC == If I remember correctly > and what other protocols are planned ? There is no )#*&$)@! plan. > > What's the difference? :) Usually you use paketfilter to protect > > permissions ;0 > > uh ? > PF can't protect from an exploit. You really miss some points. And I am not going to do more basic hand-holding. ciao -- Philipp Buehler, aka fips | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p> #1: Break the clue barrier! #2: Already had buzzword confuseritis ?
