Zitiere Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > rdr applying to outgoing connections has some ugly implications, apart > from just adding more complexity and bloat.
I'm not enough into the architecture of pf to do intelligent suggestions about what could/should be done to achive a certain goal. Only seeing the rules and not knowing anything about the internals of pf i just preferred my ways :) > I see what you mean, but I don't think this is worth it. The new rdr semantics, > I mean, not route-reply-to itself. Great :) And as i said, i'm willing to help (if i can be of any help), if route-reply-to is to be implemented. Clemens
