On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 04:46:33PM -0400, Mike Frantzen wrote: > > To make matters > > more complex, if the application crashes, it may leave permanent rules > > in the ruleset. > > Aha! That is a real issue. The way we had talked about solving that up > in Calgary was to extend proc so rules could be tied to a process. When > the process goes away, it calls back into PF which removes the rules. > Were we talking about that in Calgary or in DC a year ago?? Hell, I > can't remember. Bob was running around in a tizzy with excitement > though (now that was a sight!)
Indeed. Unfortunately, the excitement hasn't lead to any code, yet. But I still think that's how it should be done, if and when we do it :) Daniel
