On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:06:55PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:43:16PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > >>Henning Brauer wrote: > >>>either you have more queuedefs you are hiding from us > >yes, you have. > >look, the error is obvious. > Ah, ok. Has the checking been tightened? This worked for ages...
yes, it has been tightended. we guarantee now that same named queues even on different interfaces have the same queue ID. as you were adding two same named queues even on the same interface, they were getting different queue IDs before, which is very confusing and leads to it not working like you expect. now they get the same queue ID, but the kernel notices the queue ID is already taken for the second one and throws an error. perhaps we should add the same check in userland to give a better error message.
