On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:39:36PM +0200, Primo? Gabrijel?i? wrote: > > Henning Brauer wrote ... > > > > > > > After all positive feedback - is there any chance we can > > > > > see this submitted to -stable? I think quite some people > > > > > would applaud to that. > > > > > > > > I intend to get that into -current soonish. > > > > > > > > it's not really a -stable thing - only bugfixes go to -stable. > > > > > > Preventing the if_tun to spin without a reason isn't a bugfix? > > > > not really. that changes how tun interfaces work. > > > > the reason -stable is so stable is that we are very very very > > conservative and careful with what goes to -stable. I don't > > think this is a candidate. > > > > why not just run -current ;-) > > Because I also run few mailing lists and intend to minimize downtime on that > computer. IOW, I am also very very conservative :-)
but for updating to latest stable you need one reboot anyway - so why not just apply the patch, build kernel, reboot and be happy ;-) -- Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
