On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:45:47PM +0900, KOZUKA Masahiro wrote: > pass in on fxp1 route-to (fxp0 fe80::1) from 3ffe:****:****:****::/16 to !fe80::/16
The route-to argument is meant to be the address of the next hop (usable for an arp lookup, for instance). Using a link-local address there has no defined meaning yet. We'll have to test whether the suggested patch, using nd6_output(), keeps the existing semantics (where the argument is a next-hop address) intact. If it does, I think supporting link-local addresses as arguments is a good idea. Daniel
