On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 11:37:06PM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Invalid argument.
here's an odd one ( they're all odd to me <G> ).
i've now made two altq declarations.
one on the internal interface:
( cbq, consisting of 118 queues total, parents and/or children )
and one on the external interface:
( hfsc, consisting of 5 queues total, flat, no children outside
of the queues defined in the 'altq on' ).
if the order they appear in the conf is:
altq cbq INT
( INT queues )
altq hfsc EXT
( EXT queues )
i get the DIOCADDALTQ error.
basically, any valid combination of order ( ie 'altq on' being
above the queues which will be it's children ) in which the INT
( cbq ) are above the EXT ( hfsc ) gives the error.
if i put the EXT ( hfsc ) queues above the INT ( cbq ) queues in
the pf.conf, i receive no error // parses/loads fine.
set require-order no
made no difference.
no big complaint, persay, it's something super easy to deal with
( just put the hfsc guys on top, regardless of what interfaces
queueing is happening on, i guess ), so more or less i'm asking
in a round-about way if that is unexpected behaviour?
jared.
( pf.conf relavant to this: http://www.ice-nine.org/jrrs/pf-h.vs.c )
