[ I tried to mail you privately, but your mail setup is borken ] On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:43:47PM +0300, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote: > once tracking recent pf changes around tagging capability, i > am started to think about 802.1p. why not? > > actually, vlan code is (en|de)capsulation engine, priority is > the altq's land. let's think... > > - add the dot1p scheduler, similar to priq, but with priority > field reduced to 3 bits and red-only parameter; > - teach pf 0x8100 ether type; > - tagging with pf is already in -current; > - glue the things above. > > so, this is an idea. opinions?
If I don't have to read a boring "802.1p standard" paper... why not, if it makes sense. right now I don't know what hides behing .1p. perhaps I just forgot it. -- Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
