On 20 Nov 2003 06:46:09 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Winder) wrote: > >Thursday, November 20, 2003, 2:11:39 PM, Greg wrote: > >> If you are using P2P, I've found that CBQ works better than priq for >> traffic management and ACKPRI. > >Why does people think i got involved in such things.
Perish the thought :-) > >> Here are some snippets to give you an idea or two. > >Thanks, looking into it. Probably have to do some more reading on the >tagging and labeling stuff you use. Labelling is there for my benefit in pftop. Tagging is new as of 3.4 and most useful it is too and all. >But why do you use CBQ on both the >external and internal interface is that a requirement ? Remember packets can only be queued as they leave an interface. So for any incoming connection, queueing on the outside interface takes care of the reverse path traffic, queueing on the interface closest to its destination takes care of the forward path traffic. It keeps the blighters at bay and stops any attempt to flood the destination with connection requests. > >> Another few jars I owe Daniel and Co. > >Not yet, walking to the ATM machine now. ;-) > LOL! greg > > > > > > -- $ReplyAddress =~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # Delete everything after the '@' The Following is a true story..... Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.
