I don't recall there EVER being a non-backward compatible change to PF - can anyone correct me on this? (cross-posted to pf@ as they are the PF experts)
Dom - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dom De Vitto Tel. 07855 805 271 http://www.devitto.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven S. Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 7:56 PM To: 'Bryan Irvine'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3.4 upgrade I remotely upgraded some 3.2 machines with no syntax changes in pf. One of the machines is used as a multi-segment firewall, doing NAT, rdr, and standard pass/block and no changes were needed (that I have discovered). -Steve S. Bryan Irvine wrote: > I'm upgrading a 3.3 install to 3.4 tomorrow. The only part I'm > concerned with is getting pf back and running. I'm only using > standard pass/block, rdr, and antispoof. Is there any syntax changes > I need to know? Anywhere I can read up on changes to pf? > > --Bryan
