On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:25:03AM -0600, the entity calling itself Christopher D. 
Lewis stated:

> >Following is an entry from pfTop a few minutes ago:
> >
> >tcp  In  206.33.230.44:4895    127.0.0.1:8025
> >ESTABLISHED:FIN_WAIT_2   46:38:32  00:00:44  335K   13M
> >
> >This guy has been going at it for nearly two full days. I'm running a
> >"stock" 3.4 OBSD spamd setup... should I change anything?
> >
> >

> Sounds like you've achieved the purpose of the spamd setup perfectly:  
> you have consumed spammer resources while not really affecting your 
> own.
> Congratulations!
>       --Chris
> 

Thanks for your encouragement. Maybe I'm reading the pfTop output
incorrectly, but doesn't it say that _my_ resource cost on this
transaction was 335K packets and 13 MBytes of bandwidth? If so, I
wouldn't call this "no effect" on my resources.

Maybe I wasn't clear on the spamd's "value proposition"; I thought it 
stuttered, staggered and delayed required responses to the targeted 
ip address - forcing the spammer to keep the connection open, but not 
necessarily sending buttloads of data. 

Thanks for any clarification on this,
Jay

PS:
For the record, this host finally disconnected after nearly 49.5 hours: 

<snip> spamd[23429]: 206.33.230.44: disconnected after 178157 seconds.


Reply via email to