On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:47:17PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote: > We have one client (more to come, wich is why this is a bit > of a concern) that has very high packet/second > rate while the actual bitrate is fairly low (small VOIP packets) and
> Am I missing something obvious here, or is cbq not suited for high > packet/second shaping > or what? cbq has the trait of coupling bandwidth with delay. if you want to ensure less latency, you need more bandwidth. cbq is great for when you want to guarantee that each client can receive equal bandwidth when there is much traffic; or also to gracefully deal with situations where only one client is active, so it receives the benefit of borrowing. but for you, you want to be able to create a queue where you are not allocating to the queue a high overall bandwidth, but it has the property of a very low latency, so this is what hfsc can provide you. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~hzhang/HFSC/tech.html http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~crossbow/rp/plugins/hfsc.html jared -- [ openbsd 3.4 GENERIC ( mar 1 ) // i386 ]
