With thanks to Jared, can any of the HFSC experts comment on my questions from 03 Jan (link: http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf/msg05979.html )?
I'm still unclear on the semantics of "priority" in HFSC. Also, responding directly to that reply, --- jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 02:33:37PM -0800, John Ricardo wrote: > > to directly answer your question, yes, the bandwidth specified is > unused unless the queue sees packets, and no, it is not *simply* So, to summarize, if I had one queue with a 128 KB/s realtime specification and all other queues did not have a realtime specification, I would only pass traffic at (max_upload_rate - 128 KB/s) if the realtime queue was empty (and thus not using the full upload bandwidth available)? > > 5. Is it necessary to provide bandwidth/scheduler specifications > for > > parent queues if specifications are given for all the leaf queues? > Is > > there any benefit to doing so? > worth mentioning in this case is that the sum of all the leaves > on a particular branch is relative to its parent and not the > tree as a whole. This applies only when specifying things as percentages, and not in the case where absolute transfer rates are provided, correct? Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
