I think the idea is sound but instead of pf.conf examples maybe pfctl examples for basic and advanced scenarios. Steven Schubiger([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 05:08:11AM +0200: > Hi > > My question is, whether it would be of any interest to anyone, > if basic/extended pf "syntax" would get published in an O'Reilly book, > assigned to the category "pocket references", along with some specific > pf.conf examples and documentation; and at last, some sample usages of > pfctl et al. > > Could we divert the "profit" over to the development of pf? > I don't have a great financial urge to do it, since I earn already too > much... err, enough money. :-) > > Steven
-- Allie D. Allnix, LLC. http://www.allnix.net
