On 4/17/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Kimi Ostro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-17 17:37]: > > On 4/15/05, > > Do we really need keywords for anything other than the most common TOS's? > > nah, I think we have that already for filtering on tos (or was it > numeric only? I had to check). > not sure wether >
well, pf.conf(5) BNF part says: tos = "tos" ( "lowdelay" | "throughput" | "reliability" | [ "0x" ] number ) that's only three keywords though or a hex value. > pass in on $some_if keep state set-tos 0x10 > > would be any good Quite like set-tos 0x10 seems more the pf way, rather then to my: tos = 0x10 the reason I originally said "tos =" is that the filtering rules, after being parsed by pfctl(8) end up something like: pass in on rl0 inet proto tcp from any to any port = http > maybe set tos > doesn't fit well with the current grammar either > saying that, some of pf's gammar is little perculiar in some respect. hehe. Regards -- Kimi
