On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 07:43:45 -0500, Jonathan Camenisch proclaimed... > I will say one word in my own defense - even if it has no practical > point (since I intend to try to do things in a standard "pf way"). It > really seems less readable to me to mix quick and non-quick rules. > When there's a mixture, you have to read and comprehend a non-linear > sequence. But with the way that pf works, I wouldn't want to throw > away quick altogether, just because I don't want pf reading the whole > file for every packet (well, minus skipped rules).
How many rules do you have approximately? 1000? 2000? If so, I can see where mixing in quick would be a bit confusing.
