On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:38:48 -0300 "Gustavo A. Baratto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that I could write the rule with the ips harcoded in it, > but I assume this doesnt change the fact that macros are not > expanding CIDR addresses, and this maybe a bug. I was trying more to > warn about this rather strange behaviour than to find an alternative > solution. I think the bug is that the rules are defined with a mixture of strings. You could try defining it all in quotes, which is the only way I have ever defined it really, then the CIDR notation should be expanded. If not, then yes, it probably is a bug, and you could try `sendbug`. -- http://edd.link9.net - http://irc.is-cool.net
