"Chris Willis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What changes need to be made to the ruleset to allow outbound PPTP > connections? Here is the existing NAT rule I though might work based on > browsing the Archives:
googlemancy on PF NAT PPTP seems to indicate that some sort of proxying (see eg http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20041009000521) and letting gre traffic pass is needed. I actually downloaded and started fiddling with frickin rather soon after it was announced, but before I had a working setup, the users who wanted to use a "Microsoft VPN" for something or other thought of some other way to do what they needed. (Microsoft - no, there's always an easier way :)) -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" 20:11:56 delilah spamd[26905]: 146.151.48.74: disconnected after 36099 seconds.
