* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 13:06]: > Selon "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > i was thinking at a bridge firewall with openbsd, and maybe carp to be > > redundant > > > but carp is not working with bridge > > > > I'd think really hard about why you would want to make it a bridge > > then. Bridges generally makes it harder to debug and as you say it > > takes your main redundancy feature off the table. Why not just a > > carp/pfsync setup? > > cause i'm in the same subnet
so get a little transfer net and make your upstream adjust his routes otherwise you need a bridge indeed, but you really want to avoid that if you have a chance to go for regular routed with carp etc. -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
