Tobias Wigand wrote:
hi,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Unfortunately I have found only generic sentences and not the answer
to my question: how exactly "priority" works?
Or, from a practical point of view: a queue with an high "priority"
parameter gets ALL the bandwidth he wants from queues with lower
"priority" (except, maybe, for the "realtime" one)?
well, if i get you right, your question is answered here:
http://calomel.org/pf_hfsc.html
quote:
Cbq and HFSC queues with a higher priority are preferred in the case of
overload.
OK, but the word "preferred" is little generic for me, especially
because this sentences is used to differentiate from the behaviour of
the "Pri" queues: "Priq queues with a higher priority are always served
first".
So, in HFSC queues with higher "priority" are not ALWAYS served before
queues with lower "priority"?
Maybe the "realtime" bandwidth is alway served first and then the
"priority" parameters enters in action?
Queues with higher "priority" gets ALL the bandwidth they need
regardless of the "linkshare" of queues of lower "priority"?
Bye.
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________
