Hi.  Let me just say pf is absolutely fantastic!  It is actually
a joy to work with.

Ok, the problem:

I need to be able to create *stateless* nat rules for at least
150,000 entries, potentially to grow to 1/2million entries.  The
reason has to do with being able to work in an asymetric routing
environment -- stateless nat must be used because traffic might
not egress at the same location it ingressed.  In other words I
want to do a unidirectional translation and then fahgettaboutit.

For the moment let's ignore the cpu/mem/pcie/bus or other
hardware requirements to maintain a large translation table and
perform hdr rewrites fast enough.  We can also ignore any
performance requirements of nats/sec.  And lastly we can ignore
how translation table insertion or removal operations may affect
pf's realtime stability/reliability.  I will likely touch on
these subtopics (perhaps in a new thread?) once I find out if
stateless nat is even possible.

Is there a "no state" directive for nat rules, similar to the
no-state directive for filter rules?  Or another clever way to
use nat/rdr/filter statements?  Even though I wasn't able to find
any affirmative evidence in pf.conf(5) manpage I thought I'd ask
anyway.

While I'd prefer a "yes pf can do this" answer, I will accept a
"no...but here are the code sections you'll want to look at to
start your patch work" answer.  ;)

Thanks.

-- 
Adam Richards
e:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | k:0x0BA2643B |

Reply via email to