On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Jacob Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm new to pf but am learning quick. I've got one pf box up and running and > working great. Now I want to try to simplify things a bit. > > I have multiple VMs each with their own public IP that need nat and rdr > rules. For now I've been duplicating the nat and rdr rules for each new > virtual host. Currently there's only a few VMs but soon I'll have 30-50 VMs > each with mostly the same nat and rdr rules.
I know this is not what you're looking for, but I've never been a big fan of NAT. With all these public IPs, is ditching NAT an option--and putting public IPs on these hosts instead? I promise PF will still work swimmingly ;) .
