Hi all,
I've got set of linked dw's for which I'd like to control row selection.  I'm having a 
devil of a time figuring out how to handle the references, and could use some ideas.

I'm using the rowselection service (extended select).  I'm using a single Delete 
button on my parent window, which deletes rows from the dw which has focus.   I'd like 
to use a generic solution that I can code in an ancestor, but I'm starting to lose 
hope.

I tried putting this.selectrow(0) in the dw losefocus event, but of course that kills 
my selection whenever I click on the delete button.  I also tried putting a 
*selectrow(0)-for-everything-but-this* in dw ancestor's getfocus event, but I get a 
bunch of reference errors.

What's the solution?  Is there any sort of "do something in whatever other dw's happen 
to be on my parent window" code that I can put into my dw ancestor?  Or will I have to 
code this into all of my descendants after I put them on their window?

Thanks in advance,
Marvin Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                                                       
                                                
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE:   help pfcsig
> SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to