First let me thank everyone who has responded to my original question of whether you need Jaguar and Dynamo and PFC. Lot's of good opinions out there. Along the same light, here is a new one. Adaptive server products (AnyWhere and Enterprise) seem to have included much of the processing (balancing, multi-threading, etc.) that Jaguar seems to have. Does this mean that by using Adaptive server products and PowerDynamo that I can have a stable, high-performance dynamic HTML web/application server environment? It appears so from the documentation. It also appears that you should design your application in this environment like a two-tier, which, if true, makes a lot of sense for efficiency, control, and reduced cost of development. Where's Boris when we need him? - LOL. The reason that I am asking these questions is that I have been handed a fairly large project that includes the following: Hand-helds using SQL Anywhere replicating to local server Laptops to local server using internet clients to local server (direct connect) customer inquiries to local server using internet local server replicating to corporate server using internet laptops to corporate server using replication and internet clients to corporate sever using internet and catalogue capability from corporate server for customers using internet. Yep, just about covers it all!!! So, any way of staying within a two-tier approach for development and deployment is desirable from a development, deployment, and on-going cost perspective. Anybody available to work on this project. All new code!!! Thanks in advance, Mike > [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS > A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig > SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
