Hi Dion,
Here are a couple of questions...
Why not initiate your 'update' code from the pfc_preclose event?
I am curious about why you are updating the datawindow in the save event.
Obviously it can't be something for the users to see, so if you have a DBMS
that can support stored procedures why not perform that function on the
DBMS?
Sheldon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wirrenga, Dion W. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 11:02 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: PFCSIG Missing updates during close process
>
> Has anyone found a work around for the following situtation?
>
> I overrode the pfc_save event to do some updating of my datawindow and
> then
> I call the Super. The problem happens when the window is closed without
> saving changes first. What happens is that the pfc_close process builds
> an
> array of objects with updates pending and if the array contains any
> objects
> the prompt is sent asking if I want to save my changes before closing. If
> I
> respond with 'yes', the pfc_save event fires, my code is executed which
> does
> updates to the dw and then I call the super. The ancestor script for
> pfc_save checks to see if the close is in progress, and it is in this
> case,
> so the array of updateable objects is not rebuilt. This is a problem for
> me
> because my dw did not have any changes pending when the window was closed
> but now does because of my code in the pfc_save event, so my dw doesn't
> get
> in the update sequence.
>
> I need a way to get my updates ahead of the save process. Any
> suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dion W.
>
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS,
> ADDRESS
> > A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help
> pfcsig
> > SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig
> SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
