"Can Icann really be necessary?"
http://j.mp/k6uAMg  (This message on Google Buzz)

 - - -

http://j.mp/kVWXrA  (Guardian UK Article)


   "Google isn't the DNS, but its method suggests new approaches. To that
    end, some technologists have suggested creating a DNS overlay,
    operated in a peer-to-peer way that incorporates modern search
    techniques and other tools. Making this workable and secure would be
    far from trivial, but it's worth the effort." 
      -- Dan Gillmor

  - - -
--Lauren--


----- Forwarded message from David Farber <[email protected]> -----

Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:40:26 -0400
From: David Farber <[email protected]>
Subject: [IP] re ICANN
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: ip <[email protected]>

I agree . Just like I have said many times djf

Begin forwarded message:

From: Dan Gillmor <[email protected]>
Date: June 23, 2011 4:33:16 PM EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: re ICANN

Dave, FYI re ICANN:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jun/23/icann-internet-domain-names

Dan

-------------------------------------------

----- End forwarded message -----

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein ([email protected]): http://www.vortex.com/lauren
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org
Founder:
 - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org
 - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: http://www.gctip.org
 - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenweinstein 
Google Buzz: http://j.mp/laurenbuzz 
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com
IDONS Discussion Forum: http://j.mp/hLVOUv

_______________________________________________
pfir mailing list
http://lists.pfir.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir

Reply via email to