"AT&T & Verizon, with the FCC, Blocked My Access to Critical Broadband Data"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/att--verizon-with-the-fcc_b_9259834.html

        First, let's kill off a myth about the existing copper networks.
        'Common wisdom' would have you think that the copper wires are
        unprofitable or that they are not being used and should be 'shut
        off'.  However, the FCC's recent summary data refutes that - and
        we're talking about lots of money that suddenly just showed up.
        In 2015, the FCC claimed that in 2013, special access revenues
        was now a $40 billion market, and that 60%, the majority of the
        market, are still 'copper-based' services using the existing
        copper utility wires -- that's over $24 billion dollars.  This
        is up from their last projection, where they claimed that the
        entire market was only $12-$18 billion.  This means that the
        access markets are growing, and therefore the number of
        copper-based lines and services have also been growing -- and
        fast; according to the FCC the market more than doubled, (though
        some of this is because FCC's original numbers were just stale,
        made up approximations).

 - - -

= = = =
 Internet Political Trolls Collection Project (USA 2016): 
 http://vortex.com/trolls
= = = =
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein ([email protected]): http://www.vortex.com/lauren 
Founder:
 - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org 
 - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
Google+: http://google.com/+LaurenWeinstein 
Twitter: http://twitter.com/laurenweinstein
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com
I have consulted to Google, but I am not currently 
doing so -- my opinions expressed here are mine alone.
_______________________________________________
pfir mailing list
http://lists.pfir.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir

Reply via email to