Supreme Court case/Google
By the way, in the Supreme Court case today, the plaintiff arguing
that YouTube had "created new content" that by virtue of being new
would not be protected by Section 230 -- specifically by displaying
thumbnails and URLs for uploaded videos -- I think had pretty much
everyone else shaking their heads. -L
- - -
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
[email protected] (https://www.vortex.com/lauren)
Lauren's Blog: https://lauren.vortex.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenweinstein
Mastodon: https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren
Founder: Network Neutrality Squad: https://www.nnsquad.org
PRIVACY Forum: https://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
_______________________________________________
pfir mailing list
https://lists.pfir.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir
