Ah, OK - I was working on them one at a time.

Thanks, patches applied!

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Kleiman <mklei...@pivotal.io>
wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> In our previous email, the second patch fixed the linting issue from the
> first patch.
> However, we've remade these two patches so they both pass the linting test.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt and João
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Dave,
>>> Did you use the latest one patch we sent?
>>> We realised that this was an issue in the second email we sent.
>>>
>> Just checked again, and yes, that was the third and latest version I've
>> received..
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Joao
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017, 8:15 AM Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Shruti Iyer <si...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi again!
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached are the most updated patches. We found an issue with the
>>>>> previous implementation. So we generated the new patches.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The 01 patch fails linting:
>>>>
>>>> /Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/regression/javascript/history/
>>>> query_history_spec.jsx
>>>>   188:9   error  Expected indentation of 10 spaces but found 8   indent
>>>>   196:7   error  Expected indentation of 8 spaces but found 6    indent
>>>>   198:7   error  Expected indentation of 8 spaces but found 6    indent
>>>>   202:12  error  Expected indentation of 10 spaces but found 11  indent
>>>>   205:11  error  Expected indentation of 8 spaces but found 10   indent
>>>>   212:9   error  Expected indentation of 10 spaces but found 8   indent
>>>>   214:11  error  Expected indentation of 8 spaces but found 10   indent
>>>>   217:11  error  Expected indentation of 12 spaces but found 10  indent
>>>>   219:9   error  Expected indentation of 6 spaces but found 8    indent
>>>>
>>>> Can you please fix that up and double-check the tests pass?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Page
>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>


-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to