Hi
I created a table with:
create table bigun as select * from generate_series(0, 1000000)
I then selected it in the treeview, and it showed 0 for estimated rows, and
nothing at all for counted rows. I ran a vacuum full on the new table, and
now it fails to display the properties. On the console I see:
Exception in thread Thread-1618:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/threading.py",
line 810, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/threading.py",
line 763, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py",
line 602, in process_request_thread
self.handle_error(request, client_address)
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py",
line 599, in process_request_thread
self.finish_request(request, client_address)
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py",
line 334, in finish_request
self.RequestHandlerClass(request, client_address, self)
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py",
line 655, in __init__
self.handle()
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/werkzeug/serving.py",
line 200, in handle
rv = BaseHTTPRequestHandler.handle(self)
File
"/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/BaseHTTPServer.py",
line 340, in handle
self.handle_one_request()
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/werkzeug/serving.py",
line 235, in handle_one_request
return self.run_wsgi()
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/werkzeug/serving.py",
line 177, in run_wsgi
execute(self.server.app)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/werkzeug/serving.py",
line 165, in execute
application_iter = app(environ, start_response)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 2000, in __call__
return self.wsgi_app(environ, start_response)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1991, in wsgi_app
response = self.make_response(self.handle_exception(e))
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1567, in handle_exception
reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1988, in wsgi_app
response = self.full_dispatch_request()
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1641, in full_dispatch_request
rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1544, in handle_user_exception
reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1639, in full_dispatch_request
rv = self.dispatch_request()
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py",
line 1625, in dispatch_request
return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
File
"/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pgadmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask/views.py",
line 84, in view
return self.dispatch_request(*args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/utils.py", line 242,
in dispatch_request
return method(*args, **kwargs)
File
"/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/tables/utils.py",
line 150, in wrap
return f(*args, **kwargs)
File
"/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/tables/__init__.py",
line 574, in properties
estimated_row_count = int(res['rows'][0].get('reltuples', 0))
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '1e+06'
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Please find updated patch with suggested changes.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>> murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In my opinion, displaying 2000+ instead of actual value doesn't looks
>>> good.
>>>
>>> Let say my threshold is set to 5000 and I have 1million rows, displaying
>>> 5000+ instead of actual value doesn't looks good.
>>> OR
>>> What we can do is, we can hide the field if it is empty/or less than
>>> threshold.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think it would necessarily look bad - after all, the estimated
>> row count will be displayed right above it.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Harshal Dhumal <
>>>> harshal.dhu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Murtuza,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think for tables having row count more than preference count it
>>>>> should show preference count with plus '+' sign instead empty.
>>>>> eg. 2000+ (for table with rows more than 2000 and for preference count
>>>>> of 2000.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's a nice idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Harshal Dhumal*
>>>>> *Sr. Software Engineer*
>>>>>
>>>>> EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>> murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find updated patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Murtuza
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>> murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Dave, I'll check the implementation in pgAdmin3 & send new
>>>>>>> patch with suggested changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
>>>>>>>> murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PFA patch to fix the issue where "Rows (estimated)" field was not
>>>>>>>>> displaying long number properly.
>>>>>>>>> RM#2386
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have also added the code to count actual rows in a table [ "Rows
>>>>>>>>> (counted)" filed ] which was missing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oops. Well the idea is good, but unfortunately we want to be
>>>>>>>> careful about when we count the rows, as we could have just clicked on
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> 10B row table which would take a while. To avoid that, pgAdmin III
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> only count the rows in the table if the estimated number of rows was
>>>>>>>> below
>>>>>>>> a specific value (see File -> Preferences -> Browser -> Properties ->
>>>>>>>> "Count rows if estimated less than").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we need to do the same here - add a preferences option, and
>>>>>>>> only count if estimated is greater than the specified value (the
>>>>>>>> default
>>>>>>>> for which was 2000 in pgAdmin III I believe).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Page
>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
