Hi On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Xuri Gong <xurigo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave, >> >> Thank you very much for your feedback. >> >> That's a good idea to see individual images. But in my opinion, for >> geometry data, user often tend to see not only the individual shapes, but >> also the locations, spatial relations and distribution in a map. For >> example, if the geometries are all points, displaying the single point >> won't show much information. >> > Sure - but if they're a bunch of polygons, it might be more interesting. > >> So I think rendering the output geometry data in map is necessary. If the >> user want to see the shape of a single geometry, he/she can select the >> related row in the data grid, then the viewer can highlight the geometry in >> the map. >> > I agree the map is the ultimate tool. However, I do think that being able to quickly view a single geometry from within the grid makes a lot of sense - and for users who want to easily visualise a single geometry, will be a great deal more convenient than the map. Note that I'm not talking about anything complex here - just a convenience panel that renders the geometry, and maybe has zoom and scrolling. The viewing tab would be where the real magic happens - handling the map overlay and the ability to display many geometries at once. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
