On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:13 AM Aditya Toshniwal <
aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 6:29 AM Aditya Toshniwal <
>> aditya.toshni...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>
>>> Attached is the patch to allow pgAdmin to work behind proxy with its in
>>> built server. I have used werkzeug fixer -
>>> https://werkzeug.palletsprojects.com/en/0.15.x/middleware/proxy_fix/#module-werkzeug.middleware.proxy_fix
>>>
>>
>> Does this work with both X-Scheme and X-Forwarded-Proto headers as
>> discussed?
>>
> The proxy fix work for all standard X-Forwarded-* headers. X-Scheme is not
> used anywhere, X-Forwarded-Proto is more robust.
>

Right, but our existing code uses X-Scheme (as per old advice since removed
from the Flask website - see RM3149), and users have deployments that will
be setup that way. We need to fall back to X-Scheme if it is present but
X-Forwarded-Proto is not, to avoid breaking their installations.


>
>> I assume (as you haven't removed it) that it works in conjunction with
>> the existing reverse proxy code?
>>
> Yes it should.
>

Cool :-)


>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Aditya Toshniwal
> Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune
> "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
>


-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to