> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 October 2001 10:41 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Table modification > > > > >This is the correct way to do it, though I appreciate your > problem with > >large tables. Perhaps (for Table objects only) we should have a > >Tables.DeferRebuild property. When set true, all rebuilds > triggered by > >mods of individual properties or collections will get queued > up until > >an update method is fired. That way, the update method can > reduce all > >the required rebuilds that are queued up into as small an > operation as > >possible. > > > >What do you think? > Agreed. Another question: how do we enable table reorganization (i.e. > change the order of columns)? Ug. Don't know. I suppose that's a special case (like table/column rename) where you can't do it any way other than with a special method. > > > Do I miss something? > >I don't think so. I would suggest that we both sleep on how > to achieve > >the above for a while - in the meantime look at the more simple mods > >like updating functions/views/triggers. > Agreed. What are your plans as regards > functions/views/triggers? > Currently I'm working on Revision Control/PostgreSQL 7.2 related updates. I think it would be fairly easy to implement function/view/trigger modification *without* project rebuilding. This should be the fisrt step I think (if someone manually edits such an object they'll still have the same dependency problems anyway, so they're no worse off!). > Do you confirm creating objects in > their OID order should work for solving > dependencies? As I said, that's how pg_dump does it afaict. The only case where it (and pg_dump) fails that I've found so far is illustrated with: 1) Create table with a text column. 2) Create a function that returns a string with no arguments required. 3) Alter the column default to use that function. The table reload will fail because the function has a higher oid and therefore is not yet created. pg_dump isn't clever enough to create and alter later. Interestingly, if the function is dependant on the table you can create a cirular dependency.... I don't know how we'd fix that, though I suspect it might involve Revision Control. Regards, Dave.
Re: Table modification
Dave Page Tue, 2 Oct 2001 05:59:22 -0400 (EDT)(envelope-from [email protected])
- Re: Table modification Jean-Michel POURE
- Re: Table modification Dave Page
- Re: Table modification Jean-Michel POURE
- Re: Table modification Dave Page
- Re: Table modification Jean-Michel POURE
- Re: Table modification Dave Page
- Re: Table modification Jean-Michel POURE
- Re: Table modification Dave Page
- Re: Table modification Jean-Michel POURE
- Re: Table modification Dave Page
- Re: Table modification Jean-Michel POURE
- Re: Table modification Dave Page
