Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build

[Dave Page]

Title: Message

-----Original Message----- From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 June 2003 16:04 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build Dave Page wrote:  Yeuch. Have we completely removed the 2.4 target now? How about the Mac port is non-Unicode only for now?   Regards, Dave.  Not sure what you mean here.  Do you mean can we stil use wxMac 2.4?  I have no idea; I don't know why the requirement for wxWindows 2.5 exists.  I always assumed pgAdmin3 used some feature of wxWindows that required 2.5.  If that's not the case, I will happily move back to 2.4.  If Unicode support is the only reason to use 2.5, then sure, we can support a non-Unicode Mac version, for know.  Whatever the solution, let me know what you decide.  Right now I am trying to solve the QB and Mac problems, so that we can have them ready when we release.   Hi Adam,   As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5 for. BTW, when I can persuade it to install, I should have a FreeBSD 5.1 box to play with - albeit a pretty slow one!   Regards, Dave