> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 October 2004 13:34 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] CVS Commit by andreas: disable > function owner for pgsql < 8.0 [Tony > > So you'd really try to contact Ivan if we may use that flag on the > password control? And if we can't contact him we remove it? > IMHO there must be a distinction between non-trivial patches/code > contributions and code snippets used to demonstrate a bug and its fix.
You are missing the point. If I am ordered by a court of law to do so, then I have no choice. The fact is, we credit authors of patches of any size, and reporters of notable bugs anyway. All I am asking is that we do so consistently. > I'm having a real hard time to call this a code contribution. If someone takes the time to understand the code, fix a bug and recompile and test, then yes, it's a contribution no matter how trivial the patch. That is distinctly different from someone simply reporting a bug. Anyway, I've got better things to do than argue about this. Please note contributors of any patches applied in the format [Author Name] in CVS and the changelog, and note reporters where appropriate in a form such as 'per report from Reporter Name'. Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
