Dave Page wrote:
[CC'd to Niko as he probably want's to know about this as well]
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2005 15:15
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgadmin-hackers
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: roles
I'm thinking different here, because you're using roles and users in
different situations.
When editing roles, you're planning the access scheme layout without
necessarily having certain persons in mind. After the app is
installed,
you won't touch roles any more.
In contrast, adding users and assigning them existing roles is a
day-by-day business. That's why I'd like them separated.
Hmmm... What about:
Roles
- Login
- dave
- andreas
- niko
- Organisational (perhaps something shorter?)
- support
- finance
- admin
This sounds like an undesirable stacking of trivial collections.
Login Roles
- dave
- andreas
- niko
Organisational Roles
- upport
- nance
- in
would solve that. Or maybe shorter: Users and Roles :-)
Regards,
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
