2005/12/15, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>: > > Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:48, Guillaume LELARGE a écrit: > > > Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 16:55, Andreas Pflug a écrit: > > > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > >>I still think this patch should be applied. > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone see a reason /not/ to do this? > > > > > > > > Hm, Guillaume started a thread on pgsql-hackers about > > renaming system > > > > schemas in general, maybe we should wait for the result of that > > > > discussion. > > > > > > Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and > > that public and > > > information_schema schemas are public one. I think we > > should exclude system > > > schemas depending on their names and show public and > > information_schema, > > > whatever their actual name are. > > > > > > I can bring a new patch if you agree with this and if you > > find this useful. > > > > What about this one ? > > I've applied a modified version of this patch - thanks. >
I'm OK with your changes. Thanks for applying. -- Guillaume. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
