Dave Page wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of
the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under
there.
Any objections to this?
Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)
Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial
name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.
Right now I have (for schema _cluster1): "Slony catalog (cluster1)".
Seems sensible enough?
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
