Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Mickael Deloison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From > > what I understand I have nothing to do since my code would be under > > the Artistic License and freely available. Correct? > > Yes, in that respect you can comply with the Artistic licence in the > same way as GPL - use the same (Artistic) licence and release the > source code. > > If you are able to separate your code from the pgAdmin code however, > it may make sense to dual licence the pgScript engine - have it under > Artistic for bundling in pgAdmin, and BSD for possible future > integration with psql.
Yeah, I chatted with Dave about this a couple of days ago, and if you like this, I think that's the best. Or I think you can license the whole thing as BSD, that will have no conflict at all with pgadmin - correct me if I'm wrong here, Dave? (dual-licensing makes me shudder. Though that's generally the GPL<->proprietary combination, but the concept has a bad ring to it :-P) //Magnus -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
