On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Page a écrit : >> >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> trac would be a good one : wiki, bug tracker and source browser. Seems a >>> good deal :) >> >> We use trac for the postgresql.org infrastructure and website >> management. It seems to go wrong on a fairly regular basis :-( >> > > I know the webteam used it but wasn't aware of any problems.
Yeah - apparently it's got something to do with having 2 instances on the same box. If it's not Trac's fault (as Magnus asserts), then it must be the fault of one of it's dependencies, which is just a bad imho. >> Oh, and I just found this literally 30 minutes ago whilst adding some >> data to the PostgreSQL product catalogue I've been hacking on: >> http://www.initd.org/ (that's the psycopg site). >> > > Hehe. First time I heard of problems with trac. So, what about mantis ? > dalibo uses it and it works great (yeah, I know, I can also tell the same > about trac... PostgreSQLfr use it for the translation of the PostgreSQL > manual). No idea about Mantis. Whatever we use, it should be as simple as possible imho. I'd need to look into it some more. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
