On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I'd forgotten about that. We do it because it allows us to run > non-transaction safe DDL in separate transactions (which is required > in 8.3). Actually, this is not a major issue - all that will happen is > that the server will reject the SQL in 8.3+ if the user includes no > transaction safe DDL with other commands (or blindly accept it in > earlier versions). I say we just split the text control on those two > dialogues, per option 1. Hmm, just to add - we could always include a comment in the GetSQL() output to explain why the first statement is separate from the rest. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
