On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does that sound about right? > > We dumped the static library part, because that library would depend on > pgadmin itself, and we'd either get duplicate symbols or a circular > reference. > (pgScript requires a few classes from pgAdmin to work) > > So we're back to linking directly with pgadmin.
Oh, OK - well I'm fine with that. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
