Le dimanche 26 avril 2009 à 20:31:57, Simon Riggs a écrit : > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are. > > > > No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes > > confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise them with the > > non-array types, but thats likely to be messy. > > How about an extra radio button for Array/Non-Array? That removes the > confusion. > > The appearance of alpha sort stops people from looking further down the > list for other items.
I think Simon's right on the alphabetic sort. It's much simpler/user friendly. I don't like the extra radio button idea, but what about submenus? something like this: First menu Types Array Types User types "Types" Submenu (all internal types and pseudo-types, sorted alphabetically) "Array Types" Submenu (the same, but array ones, sorted alphabetically) "User Types" Submenu (user tables and user types) -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
