Le vendredi 4 décembre 2009 à 10:52:33, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Someone, on a french PostgreSQL forum, ask me for a statement timeout UI
> > in the query tool. Here is what I've done so far:
> >
> >  * add a config in the Query tab of the Options window;
> >  * add a textbox in the toolbar of the query tool;
> 
> We certainly don't need both.
> 

I see a use case for having both. If someone uses a lot the statement_timeout 
option, he'll be annoyed to put it in the text box every time he launches the 
query tool. You'll tell me that he can have a specific user option (with ALTER 
USER), and you'll be right. But many of my customers don't have specific user 
for their own connection (which is a bad habit, but also a difficult one to 
loose).

> >  * each query executed will first get the old statement_timeout value,
> > set statement_timeout to the text box one (which is initialized with the
> > config value), execute the real query, and then get back to the old value
> 
> Why save/reset it? The next query will just change it again anyway,
> and there's no way round that.
> 

Because every other query launch by the query tool will use it. For example 
the one of the GQB (which, AFAIK, uses the same connection).

> > I checked the UI on Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.
> 
> What's wrong with just setting it manually in the script anyway?

Nothing, if you don't do this a lot.

> There are various parameters people might want to set, that we definitely
> don't want to add UI for. I'll concede that statement_timeout is more
> likely to be used than most others, but it seems to me that forcing it
> to be set with every query is far less flexible than just setting it
> as and when required in your script.
> 

I don't have any issues with adding a UI for other parameters (work_mem comes 
to mind immediately). We can put them all in their own toolbar, so that users 
can hide it, so that it doesn't cluter the window UI. Anyways I don't see a 
lot of parameters that would need that treatment.


-- 
Guillaume.
 http://www.postgresqlfr.org
 http://dalibo.com

-- 
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers

Reply via email to