Le 05/04/2010 13:34, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : > On 05.04.2010 09:21, [email protected] wrote: >> Le 04/04/2010 22:35, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : >> >>> On 04.04.2010 22:10, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Le 04/04/2010 21:39, Erwin Brandstetter a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi developers! >>>>> >>>>> Seeing as Guillaume is on a roll, fixing bugs faster than I can >>>>> open new >>>>> tickets, I have found one more, in a feeble attempt to keep up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Thanks :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Group roles are missing for the "Owner" field of properties dialogs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You probably forgot the "Show users for privileges" preference in the >>>> Options dialog. >>>> >>>> >>> Nope, I don't think we will get away that easily. :p >>> I had that option checked, and it works the other way round, too: user >>> (login) roles are added to the drop-down "Role", "Privileges" tab. >>> The new bug concerns missing group (non-login) roles in the "Owner" >>> field, "Properties"-tab. >>> >>> >> You're definitely right. Next time, I'll read more carefully your bug >> report :/ >> >> Anyways, here is a patch to fix this. Do we need an option to >> enable/disable this behaviour? I think not, but, as we have one for >> priviledges, prefer to ask first before commiting it. >> > > I agree, I would not add another option. If it can confuse you, > Guillaume, it surely will confuse others.
Moreover, I don't like adding options like this. > If it was for me, I would treat login and non-login roles pretty much > alike across the program. But that's really a matter of taste. So do I. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
