On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Thom Brown <thombr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21 July 2010 14:32, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> >>> Tried it. Still works for me. I'm on Linux, but I don't think it is the >>> issue :) >> >> Actually, it might be. pgRule::CanDrop() is calling schema->CanDrop(), >> however schema actually contains the table object. I think this is >> because rules can exist under tables and views, so originally deriving >> them from pgTableObject seemed wrong. >> >> >> -- > > I create a rule on a view, it comes up with the "Drop/Delete" and > "Drop Cascaded" options.
I've pushed a commit that should fix this (as well as some icon improvements that I previously forgot to push). You now get the option to drop a rule from a table or view (though not if it's "the" rule that implements the view), and no longer get the option to create rules on system views. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
