On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and > one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you > make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on > something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash, > please :P) into the main repository and push that. That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time. >> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The >> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same >> account or a different one. I actually don't care. > > Dave, any comment on that? The same account seems fine to me. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
