On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> > wrote: >> So can't we do something like: >> >> #ifdef HAVE_CONNINFO_PARSE >> if (conninfoparse_shows_we_have_application_name_support) >> use connstr_with_appname; >> else >> use connstr_without_appname; >> #else >> use connstr_without_appname >> #endif >> >> ? That way it should still work with older libpq, just not set >> application_name... > > That would probably work. We should probably have a runtime check for > Windows, as we do for the EDB libpq functions.
Yeah, that's probably a good idea. Actually, what happens if we try to use PQconnect() with applicaiton_name on an older version? I assume it fails, and not just works and ignores it? > When can I expect the patch? What's with you edb folks, trying to get me to write your patches? Yesterday Haas, today you... Shall I expect a mail from Ed? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
